<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<!-- JATS 1.4 metadata record only. Not a PMC deposit: full text and submission assets are not included. -->
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en" specific-use="metadata-only-not-pmc-deposit">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jcrt</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>The Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">1530-5228</issn>
      <publisher><publisher-name>Whitestone Publications</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">17.2.marion</article-id>
      <article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article metadata</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
      <title-group><article-title>The Irreducible.</article-title></title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jean-Luc Marion</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>328</fpage>
      <lpage>337</lpage>
      <permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright held by the author(s). All rights reserved.</copyright-statement></permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://jcrt.org/archives/17.2/marion/"/>
      <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://files.jcrt.org/archives/17.2/Marion.pdf"/>
      <abstract abstract-type="summary"><p>that which we cannot speak, must we remain silent? Probably-especially if we understand why we cannot say anything about it, and have good reason for not speaking. If there is no good reason to talk about it, then we should stay silent. Yet without this prerequisite of having good reason, we could always resort to silence simply through negligence, carelessness, or more often, bad faith. The inability to say anything, or to have nothing to say, can at times come from our decisions, explicitly or implicitly. At other times, in remaining silent, we persist under the conditions of speaking, namely, by thinking.2 Overall, if the questions we pose concerning that which we deem unspeakable are poor, and incapable of receiving an answer, it remains possible, instead of abolishing them without further trial, to interrogate them in such a way that we might find in them another formulation; a first sense, the original utterance of which was spontaneously prohibited.</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
        <kwd>religion</kwd>
        <kwd>metaphysics</kwd>
        <kwd>silence</kwd>
        <kwd>god</kwd>
        <kwd>God</kwd>
        <kwd>Metaphysics</kwd>
        <kwd>Religion</kwd>
        <kwd>Silence</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <custom-meta-group>
        <custom-meta><meta-name>PMC deposit status</meta-name><meta-value>Not deposit ready: metadata only; complete article text and submission assets are required.</meta-value></custom-meta>
      </custom-meta-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
