Table of Contents
Pecora - Religion and Modernity in Current Debate - JCRT 4.2
Religion and Modernity in Current Debate
Vincent P. Pecora
University of California, Los Angeles
Any attempt to talk briefly about such immense subjects as “religion” and “modernity” is a foolhardy enterprise at best, and I take up this task with many misgivings. But in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001, a subsequent “war” focused mainly on what is now widely perceived to be global networks of religious (that is, primarily Islamic) terrorism, including renewed armed struggle between Palestinians and Israelis the religious elements of which cannot be ignored, it is hard not to go once again where better angels might fear to tread. The recent American invasion of Iraq has made the task of re-thinking the relationship of modernity and religion all the more pressing, since it now appears that a secular Western power with a still vibrant Christian culture’the United States’will attempt to create ex nihilo a new government and civil society in Iraq, which was once the cradle of Islamic civilization. The resurgence of a lively discussion about a “clash of civilizations,” the invocation of “crusades” and jihads, and the large body of assumptions about the secular nature of the contemporary West and the religious sensibility of those who oppose it’assumptions that appear on both sides of this divide’make it almost impossible, I think, for informed people not to wonder once again about the complicated relationship between the so-called “modern world” and religious belief.
> The New York and Washington suicide bombers seem to have been middle-class, educated men, not poor refugees. Instead of getting a wise leadership that stresses education, mass mobilization and patient organization in the service of a cause, the poor and the desperate are often conned into the magical thinking and quick bloody solutions that such appalling models provide, wrapped in lying religious claptrap. This remains true in the Middle East generally, Palestine in particular, but also in the United States, surely the most religious of all countries. It is also a major failure of the class of secular intellectuals not to have redoubled their efforts to provide analysis and models to offset the undoubted sufferings of the large mass of their people, immiserated and impoverished by globalism and an unyielding militarism with scarcely anything to turn to except blind violence and vague promises of future salvation.[1]
In such models, US retaliation in Afghanistan and the larger Western focus on Islam as the key to the nature of a modern Arab consciousness falsely assumes a uniformity of world view’one radical Islam’where in fact many and diverse Islams exist, some far more rationalized than others (not to mention very small pockets of equally impoverished Christians in the case of Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt, and elsewhere). More to the point, this model argues that in blaming religious militancy for the economic and political shortcomings of the Arab Middle East and its violent reaction against the West, the West mistakes the symptom for the illness. The turn toward so-called fundamentalist, less rationalized forms of religion in Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, and so forth is for the liberal-left mainly an ambiguous consequence of neocolonialism.
Works Cited
Ali, Tariq. The Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihads and Modernity. London: Verso, 2002.
Arnold, Matthew. Complete Prose Works, Vol. 5. Ed. R. H. Super. (11 Vols.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960-1977.
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Bellah, Robert. Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditional World. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1967.
Berkes, Niyazi. The Development of Secularism in Turkey. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Buruma, Ian. “The Blood Lust of Identity.” New York Review of Books, XLIX: 6 (April 11, 2002), 12-14.
Dobbelaere, Karel. “Secularization: A Multi-Dimensional Concept.” Current Sociology, 29:2 (Summer, 1981), 3-213.
Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Trans. Joseph Ward Swain. New York: Free Press, 1965.
Elon, Amos. “No Exit.” New York Review of Books, XLIX: 9 (May 23, 2002), 15-20.
Geertz, Clifford. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
_________, ed. Old Societies and New States. New York: Free Press, 1963.
Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.
Hill, Christopher. Puritanism and Revolution: The English Revolution of the 17th Century. New York: Schocken, 1964.
Keddie, Nikki. “Secularism and the State: Towards Clarity and Global Comparison.” New Left Review, October-November, 1997, 21-40.
Kosmin, Barry and Seymour P. Lachman. One Nation Under God: Religion in Contemporary American Society. New York: Harmony Books, 1993.
Lewis, Bernard. What Went Wrong? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Martin, David. A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
Marx, Karl. “On the Jewish Question.” Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Ed. David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
_________ and Frederick Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Trans. Samuel Moore. New York: International Publishers, 1948.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage Books, 1969.
Novalis (Friedrich von Hardenberg). “Christendom or Europe.” Novalis: Philosophical Writings. Trans. Margaret Mahony Stoljar. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997, 137-52.
Putnam, Hilary. “Wittgenstein on Religious Belief.” On Community. Ed. Leroy S. Rouner. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1991, 56-75.
Said, Edward. Commentary in Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 20-26 September 2001, No. 552.
__________. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
Slackman, Michael. “Tunisia’s 2 Faces of Progress.” Los Angeles Times, Monday, June 10, 2002, A1.
Smith, Anthony D. National Identity. London: Penguin, 1991.
Wallis, Roy, and Steve Bruce. “Secularization: The Orthodox Model.” Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis. Ed. Steve Bruce. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 8-30.
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Talcott Parsons. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976.
__________. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Ed. Talcott Parsons. Trans. A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: The Free Press, 1947.
Wilson, Bryan. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. Ed. Cyril Barrett. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.
Notes
Vincent P. Pecora is the Director of the Center for Modern and Contemporary Studies and the Director of the Humanities Consortium at UCLA. His work addresses modern literature, intellectual history, and literary theory. His books are: Nations and Identities: Classic Readings (Blackwell Publishers, 2001), an edited anthology of historical documents focused on the various meanings of “national identity” in the West, from the Reformation to the present; Households of the Soul (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997), a study of the household as fact and metaphor in anthropology, literature, and literary theory in the modern period; and Self and Form in Modern Narrative (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), an analysis of the rise of modernism in the context of the rationalized society. At present, he is working on a book about the question of religion in modern intellectual life.
’ 2003 Vincent P. Pecora. All rights reserved.
Updated 07/28/21.
http://jcrt.org/archives/04.2/pecora/
Edward Said, “Commentary in Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 20-26 September 2001, No. 552”, Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1979). ↩︎
Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage Books, 1969); see especially first essay. ↩︎
Karl Marx, “On the Jewish Question”, Karl Marx: Selected Writings, ed. David McLellan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 12-13. ↩︎
Max Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. Talcott Parsons, trans. A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons (New York: The Free Press, 1947), p. 115. ↩︎
Matthew Arnold, Complete Prose Works, Vol. 5, ed. R. H. Super (11 Vols.) (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960-1977), p. 99. ↩︎
Tariq Ali, The Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihads and Modernity (London: Verso, 2002), p. 275. ↩︎
See esp. Marx, “On the Jewish Question.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. ↩︎
Amos Elon, “No Exit.”’ New York Review of Books, XLIX: 9 (May 23, 2002), p. 15. ↩︎
Hilary Putnam, “Wittgenstein on Religious Belief.” On Community, ed. Leroy S. Rouner (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1991), p. 73; see also Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief, ed. Cyril Barrett (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966), pp. 53-72. ↩︎
Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993), p. 229. ↩︎
Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 96-97. ↩︎
Peter Berger, Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1967), pp. 105-25; for a good summary of Berger’s contributions, see Karel Dobbelaere, “Secularization: A Multi-Dimensional Concept”, Current Sociology, 29: 2 (Summer, 1981), pp. 22-26. ↩︎
Lewis, Sacred Canopy, p. 117. ↩︎
Sacred Canopy, p. 127. ↩︎
Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, essay 3, section 24. ↩︎
Genealogy, essay 3, section 27. ↩︎
Genealogy, essay 3, section 27. ↩︎
Clifford Geertz (ed.), Old Societies and New States (New York: Free Press, 1963), pp. 105-19. ↩︎
Asad, p. 18. ↩︎
See especially David Martin, A General Theory of Secularization (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978). ↩︎
See report of 1981 Gallup Poll in Barry Kosmin and Seymour P. Lachman, One Nation Under God: Religion in Contemporary American Society (New York: Harmony Books, 1993), p. 9. ↩︎
Lewis, What Went Wrong, pp. 112-113. ↩︎
For discussion of such models, see Roy Wallis and Steve Bruce, “Secularization: The Orthodox Model”, Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis, ed. Steve Bruce (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 8-30, and Bryan Wilson, Religion in Sociological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982). ↩︎
Nikki Keddie, “Secularism and the State: Towards Clarity and Global Comparison”, New Left Review, October-November, 1997, p. 30. ↩︎
Christopher Hill, Puritanism and Revolution: The English Revolution of the 17th Century.’ New York: Schocken, 1964), p. 39. ↩︎
Keddie, “Secularism and the State,” p. 36. ↩︎
“Secularism and the State,” 40n 28. ↩︎
See Michael Slackman, “Tunisia’s 2 Faces of Progress”, Los Angeles Times, Monday, June 10, 2002, A1. ↩︎
See especially Martin. ↩︎
See Lewis, What Went Wrong, p. 106. ↩︎
See Clifford Geertz, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 167-86. ↩︎